This is a “Greenstreets” area down the block from my apartment. Sometimes when I walk by it in the morning I feel sorry for it, because it’s such a small amount of dirt and trees in the middle of a huge concrete plain, and yet someone still planted a sign proudly stating “Greenstreets” in the middle. Is it worth doing so little, when it risks ending up looking so pathetic? Is it like walking into the middle of 19th-century style coal factory and installing a single compact fluorescent bulb to conserve energy? Or installing an air bag on a space shuttle?
But I guess that’s part of the Greenstreets program — incremental gains all over a monumental city should add up to a big difference. So I can respect this little triangle (TRIANGLE! Not even a SQUARE) of dirt as part of its greater mission. But I feel like the area I have photographed deserves the entire pyramid-shaped area — we don’t need that sidewalk there. Where do I sign? Whom do I sue?
Recent Comments
- Linda: CATS...
- mitch: “a version of the Human Torch action figure where you coul...
- Dan Dickinson: "Prove that John Adams wasn’t a dick." That's not a que...
- Will: I'm looking for an individual's name, Dyna! WHO invented it?...
- Dyna Moe: The necktie evolved from small scarves worn by Croatian merc...
- tony: Wow, I'm really into that Mundanes song. Thanks...
- Andrew: Check out MS Paint Adventures. The artist experimented (see...
- Linda: They Might Be Giant Cats!...
- Damian: I don't have time to keep up with the Sunday comics either,...
- Benjamin: Re: Text Adventures: are you following the production of GET...


Nov 2nd, 2007 at 11:18 am
That’s clearly a quadrilateral. I’d say trapezoid, but from this angle it doesn’t appear any two sides are parallel. So it’s just a plain old irregular quadrilateral of lonely green.
Nov 2nd, 2007 at 12:19 pm
You can sue Dog: The Bounty Hunter. It’s his fault.